+4 on making Java optional. Personally, I prefer Python for writing extensions to programs as it usually results in smaller code and less legal uncertainty. Do we / Can we have the option of making LibO extensions in Python?
-Thiago On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:19 AM, jonathon <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/03/2010 12:08 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >>> + Base HSQLDB backend > >> That would mean: ship a different database with by default, > > SQLite could easily be added. > >> would still need that backend otherwise you'd introduce a major >> incompatibility with previous versions. > > Doesn't Base have its own independent database engine. Something that > is not part of OOo/LibO? If so, then a connector for it would be all > that is required to retain the ability to use databases created for it. > >> I don't really see a chance for base unless you want to duplicate base. > > Base as the front end could be rewritten. > >> (Yes, I personally do like java, and I'd not create a code-heavy extension >> in any other language without a good reason) > > Keep the ability for extensions to be written in Java. > > jonathon > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkzQ4toACgkQaC1raifmCuGH8ACeJIUHtBv5gUswkAkv/Z8Lmvam > TpUAnijSa79TisTGN1if8p8aLoVza3AS > =obwl > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived *** > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
