Hi Maureen!
Great to have you here, welcome to the community!
> There is a chunk of data missing on the bottom
> left hand corner.
You had me scared there for a moment, but:
That's perfectly congruent with your choice of constellation points; attached output of
(roughly this code)
import numpy
from matplotlib import pyplot
# copy & pasted from your constellation object "qam"'s constellation points:
points = numpy.array([-0.9489 -0.3162j, -0.9489 +0.3162j, -0.9489 +0.9489j,
-0.3162-0.9489j, -0.3162-0.9489j, -0.3162-0.3162j, -0.3162+0.3162j, -0.3162+0.9489j,
0.3162-0.9489j, 0.3162-0.3162j, 0.3162+0.3162j, 0.3162+0.9489j, 0.9489 -0.9489j, 0.9489
-0.3162j, 0.9489 -0.3162j, 0.9489 +0.9489j])
pyplot.scatter(points.real, points.imag)
pyplot.savefig("/tmp/figure.png")
why you might not have seen the same "missing" constellation points in your channel
model's output is the frequency offset (0.01), which rotates the whole thing by 1/100 of a
full rotation per sample, so one "quarterrotation" every 25 samples; the synchronization
after might be doing its best, but might not be able to counter that. I haven't actually
looked deeper into that!
There's a few things to discuss here, like whether the constellation points are
intentionally like they are (they might be – you might be doing an experiment where you
intentionally confuse multiple points), and how an "unbalanced" (and hence not white)
transmission might affect carrier recovery.
Best regards,
Marcus
