Hi,
Based on the given modifications still I am getting a -0.300 range of BER
constantly from 0 to 15 dB range of SNR values.No variations are happening.
How can I check the functionality of the block(encoder and decoder to check
whether it's encoding and decoding properly)with a sample input.

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023, 8:11 PM U L <jaredd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> One other thing I noticed is that the encode CCSDS, decode, CCSDS, and BER
> blocks all  operate on packed bytes. (See e.g.
> https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php?title=Encode_CCSDS_27). To do this
> you would change your random source to output from 0 to 256 byte values.
> Also, considering the output of the decoder block are packed bytes you
> should probably skip the byte->float and binary slicer after your decoder
> and just input it's output directly into the BER block. Finally, looking at
> the https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php?title=Decode_CCSDS_27 page it
> seems the delay out of the decoder is 4 bytes, so you could add a delay of
> 4 between your source and BER block to align the two streams.
>
> Jared.
>
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 9:58 PM U L <jaredd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> One thing I think might be an issue is that you have no delay between
>> your source reference and your BER block. Usually the FEC decoders (and
>> possibly the encoder?) may output blocks of 0s before they output the
>> samples that correspond to your inputs. I don't know much about those FEC
>> blocks specifically, but maybe the docs have some info on their delays. You
>> can just insert a delay block b/w your random source and the ber block to
>> align the input and output bits.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>> Jared.
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 4:28 AM Jiya Johnson <jiyajohnso...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [image: image.png]
>>> Dear community
>>>    Need help for BER plot using the above flowgraph its always coming
>>> 10^-1.17 and whenever I tried to change the noise voltage the values are
>>> not changing.
>>> Please find the attached GRC file for your reference.
>>>
>>> *Regards, JIYA JOHNSON*
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to