Hi John, Thank you very much, it works!
I appreciate your help very much! George On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, 11:05 AM John Sallay <jasal...@gmail.com> wrote: > The set_min_noutput_items function exists, but sadly it does nothing > (literally nothing). I've traced the value through the scheduler code to > verify this. The only way to mostly do what you want is through > set_output_multiple (ie self.set_output_multiple(16). This will ensure > that you always receive at least 16 samples and that the number of samples > is a multiple of 16. It's not the best solution but it gets the job done. > > John > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:37 PM Jeff Long <willco...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The function is there. Perhaps you're not calling it correctly, but I >> can't tell. >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:11 AM George Edwards <gedwards....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jeff, >>> Thanks for the suggestion. >>> >>> I tried set_min_noutput_items(16) first in the __init__() method, then >>> the work() of Python file and each time I get the response Name Error: name >>> 'set_min_noutput_items' is not defined. >>> >>> Any more suggestions! 🤔 >>> >>> George >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023, 7:03 PM Jeff Long <willco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Try: set_min_noutput_items(16) >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 5:39 PM George Edwards <gedwards....@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear GNURadio Community, >>>>> I have a decimator OOT block doing my signal processing. It works >>>>> well, but after 30 or epochs, it schedule an output of one sample which >>>>> breaks my signal processing algorithm. Then the output gets scheduled to a >>>>> good number and the algorithm starts working good again before going off >>>>> script to scheduling an output of 1 sample again. Every time it does this, >>>>> it breaks my signal processing algorithm. Is there a way to force the >>>>> decimator to schedule a minimum number outputs, like say 16 samples (which >>>>> would work for my algorithm because the correspondingnumber of input >>>>> samples would be just fine)? >>>>> >>>>> Will appreciate any suggestion towards a solution. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you! >>>>> >>>>> George >>>>> >>>>
