Hi Marcus, > > The general trend of making web pages heavily dependent on Javascript > > It's an *optional* script that can be used to select what's visible, if > scripting is available. If not available, you get a nicely structured plain > text site, as before.
Then please ignore my complaint, I thought this would make Javascript mandatory to see the content. Since this is not the case, it is obviously my fault for assuming that. > > and thus unusable for some of us is frankly sad > > Ok, not my style to be *this* direct, but since you're actively trying to > guilt-trip Barry: > > You're exposed to a website that works perfectly, contrary to your claims, > both in obsolete browsers and under disabling JavaScript. It's just > *better* with. I honestly don't think you get to lament your "loss" here. > I apologise if it came off like that. It was not my intention to guilt-trip anyone. I am simply noticing more and more websites that don't work without Javascript or only work with certain browsers and I thought this will be the case too. Since I was obviously wrong I have to take your criticism as warranted. I am sorry if I have offended you or Barry. Regards, Adrian
