Hi Mutlu,
1600 MHz instantaneous bandwidth: You will be very hardly pressed building a PC-style
system that even has the necessary external bandwidth to get that in. So, you're probably
looking at hefty server systems, and more likely even, need to re-architect your system
approach to allow for distributed computing on multiple computers.
For the lower bandwidths: Whether, and on what hardware, these are feasible 100% depends
on what you're planning to do with these signals, what your reliability, latency and
flexibility requirements are, and how you get data in and out of your system. For example,
if you need to record 400 MHz of instantaneous bandwidth, you will need a rather hefty
storage array. If you don't need to record, then not. Applying a 11-tap halfband filter is
a lot easier than applying a 10003-tap channelizer. No general statement can be given,
not even on orders of magnitude, until you sat down and specified what you need in more
detail. As a general rule of thumb: 1600 MHz of instantaneous bandwidth cost *a lot* in
SDR hardware. Why would you even start to save money on a PC there? Buy the thing with the
highest clock rate, highest memory bandwidth and most CPU cores that you can get on the
market.
Best regards,
Marcus
On 19.10.22 07:54, Mutlu Aydın wrote:
Hello,
I am searching for a computer/workstation that will work with high bandwidth SDRs. Do you
recommend computer/workstation systems for working with SDRs that are capable of 200MHz,
400 Mhz, 800 MHz and 1600 Mhz etc instantaneous bandwidth based on your experience? What
are important specs (RAM CPU etc) for receiving without dropping samples?
Thank you.
Mutlu AYDIN
