Hi Mike,

Thanks for your help!

As I mentioned in my email, my flowgraph consists of some of the blocks in
the example. I dropped some of the blocks because I am doing concept
testing to ensure I know how to set parameters for the blocks. In terms of
delays, that is not a problem. I am dumping the outputs into 2- file sinks,
so in post processing I can compensate for that. The problem is that the tx
and rx data are not the same, so I am missing in setting parameters.

Thanks again!
George

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:31 PM Mike Markowski <mike.ab...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can't make out details in your image, George, but attach one I made
> when working through the tutorial and works just now under gnuradio
> 3.8.1.0.  Like someone else mentioned in another reply, I found the
> delay to be 58 and set it as the default in the attached flowgraph.
> Zoom in on the bit stream plot and allow a second or two after changing
> delay to see the effect.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Mike Markowski
>
> On 3/12/21 10:37 AM, George Edwards wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I cannot get the combined Constellation Modulator/Decoder as shown below
> > to work. The figure below is an example from the online Guided Tutorial
> > PSK Demodulation.... I leave out the Equalizer, Costas Loop blocks, the
> > channel was set to pass the signal unimpaired and the Poly Clock Sync
> > was set for Output sps=1. The constellation plot of the output of the
> > Poly Clock Sync is perfect. Now, in the flowgraph below, the signal
> > entering the Constellation Modulator and that leaving the Constellation
> > Decoder are routed into Time Sinks for display. I route these signals
> > into File Sinks so I can print them and compare 1's and 0's. The results
> > show they are not the same. I passed Constellation Rect.Object
> > parameters to both the Constellation Modulator and Decoder, which seems
> > logical to me, but I could be wrong???
> > Will appreciate any help you can provide because what enters the
> > modulator should be the same as what is leaving the demodulator.
> > Regards,
> > George
> >
> > image.png
>

Reply via email to