On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:00 PM Heikki Laamanen <heikki.laama...@dlc.fi>
wrote:

> Thanks Brian. You are right, there exists three VCOs and PLLs in the
> AD9361 which can be controlled independently.
>
>
>
> AD9361 Reference Manual UG-570 shows a more detailed diagram in Figure 7.
> on page 20. The baseband PLL comprises an N/N+1 divider controlled by a
> high-precision sigma-delta modulator. AD9361 Register Map Reference Manual
> UG-671 describes that the control word of the sigma-delta modulator
> consists of 29 bits giving a relative frequency resolution of 1.9 ppb
> (parts per billion).
>
>
>
> A brief description of the timing system.  The objective is a system for
> protecting or replacing GPS-based timing. In addition to navigation, the
> GPS system is used for generating an accurate clock which is in synchronism
> with the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). A clock synchronized with the
> UTC, can be for example a 1 Hz physical clock signal whose rising edge goes
> up exactly at the start of an UTC second. The accuracy of an GPS-based
> timing system is about +-50 ns. Thus, we can say that the phase accuracy of
> GPS-based timing is about 50 ns.  The objective is to generate such clock
> by receiving a broadcast radio signal which is known to be in synchronism
> with the UTC.
>
>
>
> You mentioned that time is completely relative. If we think of the UTC, we
> could say that it gives an absolute time which is defined by several atomic
> clocks around the globe. A copy of the UTC can be generated, with a certain
> accuracy, by receiving the GPS or other similar satellite signal (Galileo,
> Glonass, Beidou) and synchronizing to it.
>

So you want to produce something like a stable 10MHz reference and  a 1PPS
which is synchronous to UTC using broadcast/terrestrial signals such as
DVB-T, ATSC, LTE, etc?  And your edges can be within +/-50ns of actual UTC?

I guess I'm still unsure if you do or do not believe the radios out there
allow for this to happen?  I'm not sure where you believe you have a
limitation.

Brian

Reply via email to