Hi all, I was wondering about that mailing list behavior as well.
My solution 1. If "Mail From 'discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org'" 2. If "Mail To 'discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org'" In my case: move to folder. 1. covers original mails 2. covers replies. I had to split this into 2 separate rules but that's due to my email service provider. This solution is more verbose about who receives such an email. e.g. off-list replies should not end up to be caught by these rules. Anyways, I just wanted to share my 2 cents on that. Maybe someone finds this info useful. Cheers Johannes On 30.10.19 15:11, Müller, Marcus (CEL) wrote: > Hi Ed, > > "deliberate" would be wrong. Surprising, not really, if we'd have read > the info mails from the gnu.org mailing list admin more carefully: > > In the process of respecting DMARC in the ML infrastructure, they > disabled rewriting of the subject line for outgoing mail servers that > signal strict DMARC compliance. The mailing list seems to think your > server does (I don't know why, to be honest, can't seem to find those > DNS entries). > > So, for now, my understanding is that there's nothing *we* can do about > it. (We should be able to change the settings of the ML; but in which > range, and what we'd break on the way, isn't quite clear to us at this > point.) > > For some reason, my university mail server seems to sort these mails > correctly, and so do GMail instances. Probably a list header? > > Best regards, > Marcus > > On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 09:17 -0400, Ed Criscuolo wrote: >> I've noticed that recent postings to the list are missing >> the "[Discuss-gnuradio] prefix that was automatically >> added to the subject line. >> >> Was this a deliberate change? I hope not, as I find that >> feature very useful in picking out the list messages >> from amid all the spam. >> >> >> @(^.^)@ Ed >>
