Hi Ramazan - My primary wondering about your specific OFDM setup is whether the 
sync preambles are abiding by your carrier separation (256 carriers: -120:-1 
for one Tx and 1:120 for the other). It certainly looks from the images that 
the payload portion is working as you desire. Depending on the payload length, 
when using a spectrum analyzer you might not even see the blip of the sync 
preambles ...

Are you using pre-existing GR OFDM blocks in GRC, or something you created 
yourself?

Do you have GRC or Python / C++ scripts you'd be willing to share?

Some of the more involved (typically hierarchical) GR blocks such as OFDM 
provide settable variables that sometimes don't work well if not the default or 
not set -very- carefully.

Hope this is useful! - MLD

ps> Reminder to "reply all" to keep the discussion on the GR email list. More 
eyes reading means greater chances of someone providing useful help!

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Ramazan Çetin wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I have implemented OFDM system that has one receiver and two 
> transmitters. Receiver can receive signals correctly, when one of the 
> transmitters is active. However, when both of them are active, receiver 
> cannot receive all the packets. They are interfering each other.
> 
> To overcome this situation, i tried to allocate different carriers to 
> transmitters. For example; in 256 carriers OFDM system, 1 to 120 is for 
> transmitter 1 and -120 to -1 is for transmitter 2. In this situation, 
> receiver cannot still receive entire packets, when both of them are active.
> 
> At the end, i decided to give some gap between transmitters. So, 36 to 
> 90 and -36 to -90 are assigned to transmitters. But, result is same. I 
> have attached two pictures of spectrum. They represents state of one and 
> two transmitters are active. You can check the situation from there.
> 
> 
> So, can you suggest a way to receive from two transmitters without 
> interference?
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> Ramazan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> 
> 
> *Attachments:*
>  * s2.jpeg
>  * s1.jpeg
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to