Hi Marcus, Thank you for your comments. I have tried the other OFDM blocks and it's working. It has better results as well.
Best regards, Kurniawan On 24 April 2018 at 18:57, Müller, Marcus (CEL) <muel...@kit.edu> wrote: > > My questions are should I worry about this warning and try to use > another blocks? > > Yes, and yes! > > Use the header_payload_* blocks and the accompanying OFDM > infrastructure as shown in the ofdm_tx / _rx / _loopback.grc examples. > > Best regards, > Marcus > On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 13:48 +0200, Kurniawan Irianto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was trying sending packets from transmitter to receiver using ofdm > examples (benchmark_tx.py and benchmark_rx.py) and I came across warning > like these. > > > > in benchmark_tx.py: > > > > The gr::digital::ofdm_mapper_bcv block has been deprecated > > The gr::digital::ofdm_insert_preamble block has been deprecated > > > > and in benchmark_rx.py: > > > > The gr::digital::ofdm_sampler block has been deprecated > > The gr::digital::ofdm_frame_acquisition block has been deprecated > > The gr::digital::ofdm_frame_sync block has been deprecated > > > > I noticed there were a lot of packet losses when I saw the pktno number. > My questions are should I worry about this warning and try to use another > blocks? Does the deprecated blocks effect the number of packet losses in > that examples? > > > > I also realized those codes were very old examples and I am wondering if > there is an up to date example regarding the ofdm implementation in > gnuradio. > > > > Any comments and suggestions would be nice and helpful. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Kurniawan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
