This kinda looks like a good application for ZMQ, btw. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 8:12 AM Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo < carlosruiznara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perfect!! Thank you :) > > 2017-11-17 12:42 GMT+01:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu>: > >> You'd pass that object – all the objects that you create in Python have >> a name that you can pass around. >> >> Notice that you usually very much would want to avoid this. The blocks >> run in different threads, so you need take care that accesses to your >> shared object are thread save, e.g. by having internal mutexes. >> >> In your case, having a block that manages the socket, and which sends >> GNU Radio messages to your other blocks, would sound easier and safer. >> >> Best regards, >> Marcus >> >> On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 12:13 +0100, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote: >> > Hi Marcus, >> > >> > I apologize if I have not explained myself well. >> > >> > I want to use a global object (an open socket) inside blocks. Similar >> to using a global variable with the 'Python Module' block. >> > >> > The problem is that I do not know how to access to an object/variable >> created in 'Python Module' inside another module. >> > >> > Thank you. >> > >> > 2017-11-17 11:08 GMT+01:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu>: >> > > Hi Carlos, >> > > I'm a little bit confused; this sounds a lot more like you want to >> design a client/server protocol with logical "subchannels" or something >> than a GNU Radio question. >> > > >> > > If you asked me, sounds like you wouldn't go for a single socket, but >> three ZeroMQ sockets of the right usage paradigm (might be pub/sub, >> req/rep, or any of the roundrobin ones). >> > > >> > > In any case, your block has no provisions for talking to a socket, so >> not quite sure what you're asking me – "write a program that talks to >> sockets" isn't really a great question for the GNU Radio mailing list ;) >> > > >> > > Best regards, >> > > Marcus >> > > >> > > On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 10:07 +0100, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote: >> > > > Hi Marcus, >> > > > >> > > > It is the code: https://pastebin.com/Ts07d0wg >> > > > >> > > > Depends on the data of the block makes a request to the server or >> another. I want to have a common socket for all the blocks, not to use one >> client per block. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 2017-11-16 20:56 GMT+01:00 Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu>: >> > > > > Hi Carlos, >> > > > > I don't know the blocks, hence I can't tell you anything about >> them. >> > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > Marcus >> > > > > >> > > > > On 16.11.2017 19:32, Carlos Alberto Ruiz Naranjo wrote: >> > > > > > Thank you Marcus. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Where do I create the socket and how I pass it to the blocks? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Nov 16, 2017 19:07, "Marcus Müller" <muel...@kit.edu> wrote: >> > > > > > > Sure, unless the dataCapture blocks (which I don't know) have >> a bug. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > > > Marcus >> > > > > > > On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 15:26 +0100, Carlos Alberto Ruiz >> Naranjo wrote: >> > > > > > > > Hello, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > dataCapture blocks are TCP clients with different requests. >> I want use the same socket for the 3 blocks. It is posible? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thank you. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > > > > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> > > > > > > > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> > > > > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> > > > > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > -- Very Respectfully, Dan CaJacob
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
