Here are the two flowgraphs I have used. I have tried to attach the two files in my first email. Probably failed in doing that. If still not seen, please let me know so I will try again. Thanks for your help.
Running the first flow graph will cause GRC stop responding instantly, while the second one can run for a little while and produce lots of 'L' before going not responsive. Rui On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Marcus Müller <muel...@kit.edu> wrote: > Hi Rui, > > don't know, to me, it looks like replying didn't work out great, since my > mail client showed your mail in a new thread. Really, replying to a mailing > list mail should be nothing more than hitting the "reply" or "reply all" > button. > > Anyway, even the slowest PC/laptop/Raspberry Pi/… I could think of would > be able to deal with these rates, so there's very, very likely something > wrong with the GNU Radio flowgraph you're using. Maybe you'd want to share > that! > > Best regards, > > Marcus > > On 08/01/2017 04:59 PM, Rui ZOU wrote: > > Hi Marcus, > > Sorry for leaving the title empty, that's the first time to post to a > mailing list. This is also the first time to reply, no sure if I replied > correctly. > > I use 390.625k as the sampling rate because this is the lowest I can get > using the Ettus X310 without giving me a warning saying that the sampling > rate cannot be provided by the hardware. The application is just > transmitting a file using GMSK modulation on the two daughter boards of > X310. > > Rui > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing > listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > >
twoparatx.grc
Description: Binary data
onefile2tx.grc
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
