We figured out the cause of this error. I had a block called 'vector_sink2' . I also have blocks called vector_sink. Turns out the block naming simply appends the block's index to it. The first vector_sink2 gets called vector_sink21 The first vector_sink gets called vector_sink1 So at some point we got an additional 20 vector_sink blocks. So that created a 'vector_sink21', which had a name conflict with the first vector_sink2. The moral of the story is not to end the block name with a number. An even better idea is to add a separator after the block name and its index for the complete name: e.g. vector_sink2(1)
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
