Hello, I have a certain update regarding my issues and I'm hoping get some new perspective.
I repeated my experiments randomizing the mac addresses and payload. You were quite right that the issue might be related to suboptimal waveform. Because sequence numbers which were always erroneous seemed to change. However, there were still certain numbers which were constantly wrong through the randomized frames. Then I found a Usrp 2922 which I believe is n210. Surprisingly, when used as a tx, 2922 doesn't give those deterministic errors and the total frame error rate too decreased drastically to around 1-1.5% from 4-5%. Also the constellation is visibly better. Is the value of fer acceptable at 1-1.5% or should there be absolutely 0 errors. Also could there be something wrong with my Rios? Bests, Nikita On Jan 17, 2017 10:21 PM, "Bastian Bloessl" <bloe...@ccs-labs.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 01/17/2017 11:13 AM, Nikita Airee wrote: > >> >> - Make sure that the xy plot shows clear constellations. >> >> tx_gain is set to 30dB and rx_gain to 0. >> >> >> If constellations don't look nice, you could try lowering the tx and >> increasing the rx gain. (also make sure that the antennas are >> connected to the correct ports). >> >> >> The constellation is kind of clear(PFA the screenshot). Decreasing tx >> gain and increasing rx gain doesn't help either. >> >> I even tried repeating the experiment with a different set of x310s but >> there was absolutely no change. Would you still say that it could be an >> error in my hardware? >> >> Also, another observation, the error in these frames seems to be around >> the same area of that particular frame everytime. Could this mean >> something? >> > > Unfortunately, I don't have the hardware to try. > > Since you always loose the same frames it sounds like a bug in the > receiver, but then they should also be dropped in simulations. > > The last idea would be that this particular frames are mapped to a > suboptimal wave form (high PAPR?) The constellations already look like the > gain is too high. Maybe frames with high peak amplitudes get dropped. > > Best, > Bastian >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
