Hmm so I tried it out an realized my solution doesn't quite get me what I
needed.
By invoking uhd::device::sptr usrp = dummy_usrp->get_device() I put my usrp
pointer in the wrong namespace since I wanted access to set_gpio_attr(...)
Going to go think about this more

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Santos Campos <santo...@umich.edu> wrote:

> Ah sorry, I meant to mention I'm writing it in c++ not python.
> Yes, I saw that get_device() returns a sptr. I think I had a poor choice
> of words.
> I was unclear on how to even pass the existing usrp into my oot module,
> BUT I think I have a better idea now.
>
> Would something this work?:
>       std::string args = "";
>       ...
>       uhd::usrp::multi_usrp::sptr dummy_usrp =
> uhd::usrp::multi_usrp::make(args); //okay to pass an empty string address?
>       uhd::device::sptr usrp = dummy_usrp->get_device(); //creates a
> shared pointer to a usrp device created in an earlier block (usrp source,
> etc..)
>       //reference usrp like normal
> This DID compile, but it'd be great to have reassurance from the gurus.
> I'm about to try it out as well.
> Although I'm a bit confused as to why I don't have to define get_device()
> since it's a virtual function. Did the layers of wrappers take care of it?
> (hopefully it's not embarrassingly obvious. My c++ fu is a little rusty)
>
> Y'all are awesome :),
> -Santos
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com>
> wrote:
>
>> get_device() returns a shared pointer. Note this function is not exposed
>> in Python -- you need to pass the object into another C++ object, and
>> there call get_device().
>>
>> M
>>
>> On 06/08/2016 06:38 AM, Santos Campos wrote:
>> > Hi, Martin!
>> > I tried taking a peek at how the usrp sink might handle a preceding usrp
>> > source (for inspiration).
>> > Does it (and the way you described) declare a usrp device and do some
>> > kind of shallow copy with the get_device() method?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com
>> > <mailto:martin.br...@ettus.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Nah, you can just pass in the existing one into your module and
>> grab a
>> >     reference to the multi_usrp from there.
>> >
>> >     M
>> >
>> >     On 06/03/2016 12:57 PM, Santos Campos wrote:
>> >     > Hello again again!
>> >     > So I'm trying to write an OOT module to control the gpio from GRC.
>> >     > Would I have to create a usrp device in the module's code if I am
>> using
>> >     > a usrp source?
>> >     > My gut says to probably not re-declare it since it's already in
>> use, but
>> >     > I'm not sure how I could bring it into scope if I don't have to
>> >     > re-declare it.
>> >     > I tried poking around for the usrp sink code to see what it did
>> but
>> >     > couldn't find it.
>> >     >
>> >     > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Santos Campos <
>> santo...@umich.edu <mailto:santo...@umich.edu>
>> >     > <mailto:santo...@umich.edu <mailto:santo...@umich.edu>>> wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >     Worked like a charm! Thanks for the helpful comments!
>> >     >     Like I said originally, I'm trying to use the gpio to remotely
>> >     >     switch between 2 antennas.
>> >     >     Currently trying to familiarize myself with boost and the uhd
>> api.
>> >     >     Will undoubtedly be back to the listserv with questions on
>> those.
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >     On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Marcus D. Leech <
>> mle...@ripnet.com <mailto:mle...@ripnet.com>
>> >     >     <mailto:mle...@ripnet.com <mailto:mle...@ripnet.com>>> wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     >         On 06/01/2016 10:23 AM, Santos Campos wrote:
>> >     >>         Hello again, all! I've finally come back to this after a
>> while.
>> >     >>         I'm trying to get the example code to compile but having
>> some
>> >     >>         trouble. Does anyone have any experience with using the
>> uhd
>> >     >>         gpio api?
>> >     >>         I tried using this to compile:
>> >     >>
>> >     >>             $ gcc -I/usr/include/boost
>> >     >>         -I/home/santosec/uhd/host/include/uhd gpio.cpp -o gpio
>> >     >>
>> >     >>         but I got a whole mess of compiler errors.
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >         And, to follow-up with details:
>> >     >
>> >     >         http://files.ettus.com/manual/page_build_guide.html
>> >     >
>> >     >         Also:
>> >     >
>> >     >         AN-445 and AN-204 from here:
>> >     >
>> >     >         https://kb.ettus.com/Application_Notes
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >>         On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Marcus D. Leech
>> >     >>         <mle...@ripnet.com <mailto:mle...@ripnet.com>
>> >     <mailto:mle...@ripnet.com <mailto:mle...@ripnet.com>>> wrote:
>> >     >>
>> >     >>             On 05/04/2016 11:18 AM, Santos Campos wrote:
>> >     >>>             Hello! I am curious if it is possible to use a pin
>> or
>> >     >>>             something on either the B200 or B200 mini to send a
>> >     >>>             control signal.
>> >     >>>
>> >     >>>             We were hoping to be able to switch between 2
>> antennas if
>> >     >>>             the board received some signal. It looks like there
>> could
>> >     >>>             be some available pins, but we were unsure if they
>> would
>> >     >>>             be able to fulfill our purpose. If not, any ideas
>> around
>> >     >>>             this issue would be welcome!
>> >     >>>
>> >     >>>             Any help would be much appreciated!
>> >     >>>
>> >     >>>
>> >     >>>             _______________________________________________
>> >     >>>             Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> >     >>>             Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> >     <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> >     <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>>
>> >     >>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >     >>             The API for the B2xx GPIO is the same as for X3xx.
>> >     >>
>> >     >>             There's example code:
>> >     >>
>> >     >>             .../uhd/examples/gpio.cpp
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >>             _______________________________________________
>> >     >>             Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> >     >>             Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> >     <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> >     <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>>
>> >     >>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >     >>
>> >     >>
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     >
>> >     > _______________________________________________
>> >     > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> >     > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> >     > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >     >
>> >
>> >
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> >     Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> >     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to