Indeed. I updated the footer to point to the correct license and clarified that the logo is copyright Marcus. Obviously he has licensed it for purposes of this website. We had a brief conversation about it a few minutes ago in which I don't think we had an agreement on what the license for the logo should be.
I'll update again with a proper license statement for the logo once we have clarification on his intent. -Nathan On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com> wrote: > As it happens, I designed that logo; it's not necessarily under the same > license as the website. > > Now I'm curious: what's your plan? What do you want to do with that logo? > > Best regards, > Marcus > > > On 24.05.2016 21:38, Raj Bhattacharjea wrote: > > The VOLK website claims it's contents are licensed under "Creative Commons > Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International", however, the license link actually > takes you to the text of the "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 > International". > > These are different licenses and the difference is whether the license > allows others to use the content for commercial purposes. I was trying to > cite a copy of the VOLK logo when I came across this. I hope the VOLK > website maintainer watches this list and clarifies which license the site > is under. > > -- > Raj Bhattacharjea, PhD > Georgia Tech Research Institute > Information and Communications Laboratory > http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~rb288/ > 404.407.6622 > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing > listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
