Reading your proposal, I don't understand what tools exactly I'll have after you're finished, and how they would look like. Can you provide some examples and/or mockups?
M On 03/24/2016 01:11 PM, Usman Haider wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > I appreciate the time you spent reading the draft and providing such > detailed feedback. I have uploaded some related MATLAB code on my github > account [1]. I have added some snapshots in the directory as well so > that one can see the output without running code. Also uploaded java > code written for android application that plots spectrum (magnitude and > phase) of data received on Bluetooth [2]. I have added these in my > proposal. I am mentioning here for quick reference. I have updated my > proposal according to your feedback. You can find updated proposal here: > > https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf > > > Thanks again for your feedback. > > > Regards, > Usman > > > [1] https://github.com/UHaider/PastCode/tree/master/MATLAB > [2] https://github.com/UHaider/PastCode/tree/master/Android > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:01 PM, West, Nathan > <n...@ostatemail.okstate.edu <mailto:n...@ostatemail.okstate.edu>> wrote: > > Looking through the proposal I mostly see your translation of the > idea from the GSoC ideas list to a proposal format. All of that is > fine, but we've already decided this is a reasonable idea and the > proposal should convince us that you're the right person to work on it. > > You've provided the right evidence that you've read some of the GSoC > pages, but my current criticism boils down to missing information > that we ask for > here: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/wiki/GSoCStudentInfo > > I'll point out *some* specifics but please don't just list responses > to these things in the proposal. Rather reshape it to giving us an > idea of what you want to do (which you have) and why you're the > right person. The list I'm providing is not meant to be exhaustive, > and I'm not suggesting that you're not the right person to do this, > just that you haven't addressed that (or your eligibility for GSoC > in your proposal. It's also possible I am being dense and missed > some of this information. > > From the page I linked you're missing: > * Proof of your coding capabilities (this is the big one) > * University and student status (more of a formality) > * why do you want to do *this* project? (this is not critical, but > if you've done any classes or work in areas related to your proposal > idea than that looks very good) > > Ideally this is all more than a single sentence that says "I did a > matlab simulation once in a class and it was cool", but much less > than a college admissions essay on why DSP will save the world. > > Looking forward to the next draft (and hopefully faster turnaround), > -Nathan > > PS - most of this email can be copy and pasted as feedback for > several other proposals I've read so far. > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Usman Haider > <usmanhaide...@gmail.com <mailto:usmanhaide...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I have not get any feedback on this yet. I hope I have not > missed anything important? Please, provide feedback on this. > > > Regards, > Usman > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Usman Haider > <usmanhaide...@gmail.com <mailto:usmanhaide...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I have added lambda expression in deliverables based on > Tim's comments. This will allow user to enter lambda > expression in GUI. That expression will be then evaluated on > samples and result will be displayed. Rather than providing > fixed mathematical function (scale/normalize), user can > apply anonymous functions, they want, on samples using > Lambda construct. This will give user more flexibility. I > have updated my proposal. You can see it on following link > > https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf > > Awaiting feedback. > > Regards, > Usman > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Usman Haider > <usmanhaide...@gmail.com <mailto:usmanhaide...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > Hi Community, > > I have made my proposal for the subject GSoC idea. > Please have a look and give feedback. Thanks for your time. > > > https://github.com/UHaider/GSoC/blob/master/GSOC%20Proposal.pdf > > Regards, > Usman > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
