Correction: Spectrum shows fine. Just had to enlarge the panel:) On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jonathan, > > That helps a lot. I still don't get a spectrum, but I get a nice fosphor > panel and no timeout errors. A couple of questions: > > 1) You seem to be using 2 ffts: RFNoC FFT and RFNoC Fosphor. You can only > do 1 FFT. What's the difference between those 2? > 2) You start with an RFNoC Radio instead of a USRP source. Does that mean > that the flow is intended to run from the FPGA? What is the meaning of the > QT display in such a scenario? > > BR, > Nikos > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Jonathon Pendlum < > jonathon.pend...@ettus.com> wrote: > >> Hi Nikos, >> >> Have you tried running the example fosphor flowgraph in >> gr-ettus/examples/rfnoc? >> >> >> >> Jonathon >> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Upon closer inspection I do get a few runtime errors: >>> >>> timeout on chan 0 >>> >>> Looks like smt is amiss in my flow. Any ideas about that? >>> >>> TIA >>> Nikos >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Tyvm Jason, >>>> >>>> That did it. I don't actually need to set the X300's addr and type to >>>> anything. It defaults to the first one it finds, and I got only 1 ;-) >>>> I got the top block running without any errors. Not much of a fosphor >>>> display, like I'm used to, but I'm happy i didn't get any errors:) >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> Nikos >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Jason Matusiak < >>>> ja...@gardettoengineering.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> (accidentally sent original response to the wrong mailing list. sorry) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nikos, All RFNoC scripts require a Device3 block. If you look under >>>>> UHD>RFNoC in GRC you will see Device3. Just add that to your design (no >>>>> connections needed) and if you are using an X310, set your device argument >>>>> to "addr=xx.yy.zz.aa" and device address to "type=x300". >>>>> >>>>> Make sense? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
