Hi all,

Thank you Marcus for your kind reply.

My original intention is to test whether there are signal transmission in a 
certain spectrum band. So at first I want to use energy detection and other 
methods to test which band has signal, and then compare the probability of 
detection in different SNR.

I store the samples in /out.dat, cos I want to use the sample to calculate the 
detection probability.(But now I don’t know how to get detection probability, I 
wonder whether I can use the data to calculate it.)

Thanks,

Yan


From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+eexyh22=nottingham.ac...@gnu.org 
[mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+eexyh22=nottingham.ac...@gnu.org] On Behalf Of 
Marcus Müller
Sent: 12 February 2016 11:52
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] The threshold of energy detection

Hi Yan,


The threshold block converts your signal to 1 if you've been above the "high" 
value, unless it has fallen below "low" again. Everywhere else, it's 0. See the 
"documentation" tab in the block properties, or the GNU Radio doxygen manual 
[1].

But: Parseval's theorem states that energy in frequency and in time domain are 
directly proportional, so your

stream to vector -> FFT->complex to mag²-> vector to stream>moving average

can simply be replaced with a

complex to mag²->moving average

if detecting the average energy in your signal is all you want , which seems 
probable, seeing that length(average)≈length(FFT).

I'm not quite sure what your original intention was when storing 
(FFT->mag²->average) samples in test_sensor/out.dat; the signal after moving 
averaging is neither really frequency nor time domain. Out of curiosity: what 
do you want with that data?

There's very valid applications for frequency domain filters (a moving average 
is actually but a low pass FIR filter, in principle), but the convolution that 
filtering usually means is often replaced with a multiplication in time domain, 
which is much less CPU-intense and mathematically equivalent!

Best regards,
Marcus

[1] 
https://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/classgr_1_1blocks_1_1threshold__ff.html#details
¹ For new applications, I recommend Qt rather than WX -- the latter isn't going 
to be around forever.
On 12.02.2016 12:02, Yan Huang wrote:
Hi all,

I’m using USRP B210 to do spectrum sensing, and the flow graph as attached 
file. It can get a result that there is a peak at 5.8 GHz which is the 
receiving signal frequency.

But if I change the Moving Average block to a threshold, there is no output 
like previous one.

I want to ask how can I get a result have a peak at 5.8 GHz  in frequency 
domain using threshold. I can only get 1 or 0 in time domain not in frequency 
domain.

Is there anyone can give me some advice? Thanks in advance.


Yours Sincerely

Yan




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee

and may contain confidential information. If you have received this

message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.



Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this

message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the

author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the

University of Nottingham.



This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an

attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your

computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email

communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as

permitted by UK legislation.




_______________________________________________

Discuss-gnuradio mailing list

Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org<mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>

https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio





This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to