Marcus Leech writes "When a project blooms in portability, size, dependencies, and "reach", the use of a meta-make scheme of some sort actually makes those kinds of project practical."
Certainly gnuradio is not too large a project to maintain by the make utility. I hope Marcus will confirm that for the benefit of people who never use make directly. It is for reasons of portability that you need a 'meta-make', right? A meta-make is something that generates a make system or ideally might translate one from one environment to another. If I follow Marcus, a meta-make should leave a decent make system behind and you do not expect it to leave lots of traces of itself behind like cmake does. I hope to spend some time on gnuradio and the next thing I will do is put a simple build system in place for my own use. I don't see a problem. SDR is the main aim but I am interested in cooperating with anyone who wants to get the most out of make. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
