Hi Antonio,
I tried to open your GRC file. This must have been with a pretty old
version of GNU Radio (which version are you using?).
I strongly recommend getting a newer version of GNU Radio, because
especially the OFDM code has improved a lot.

By the way, a BER of about ~0.5 means that as many bits are right as
there are wrong bits, which means that you get absolutely no information
through (if there were more wrong than right bits, you could just toggle
the bits and get more information); this means that the input and output
streams are not related, or have an offset relative to each other that
doesn't get corrected; increase the BER window size (you don't need the
delay if you've got a bigger window).

Best regards,
Marcus


On 01.09.2015 19:12, ANTONIO TAMAYO wrote:
> Hello Jawad,
>
> I've made the changes you said. As you say, when I assign the Payload
> parameter to the number of samples of the block Random Source without
> introducing Delay, I get a BER value equal to 0. But what I need to
> introduce a noise source so that when I increase the power noise, also
> increase the BER. This doesn't happen making the changes that you say,
> when I introduce a noise source and the noise power is increasing the
> value of BER remains 0. This is incorrect. As you can see in the
> spectrum received, the signal contains errors that they aren't
> appreciated by the block Error Rate. (SistemasOFDM_prueba.grc)
> Also, I need to send an image and calculate the BER in the same way as
> with the random vector. When I use the block File Source and calculate
> the BER, I have the same problem, the BER remains constant at 0.51 and
> although the noise power increases, the BER remains unchanged.
> (SistemaOFDM_Pruebas1.grc)
> The image that I send in the previos example is called "imagen"
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Antonio
>
> 2015-09-01 15:04 GMT+02:00 Jawad Seddar <jawad.sed...@gmail.com
> <mailto:jawad.sed...@gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hello Antonio,
>
>     Please take the habit of replying to the list. People might get
>     into the same problems or someone might have some knowledge to share.
>
>     Also, try to provide a flowgraph (.grc file) to make testing
>     easier for the people helping you out.
>
>     That said, I did some testing and it looks like I was wrong. The
>     delay isn't the problem here (at least not on my machine).
>     But I think I figured out the problem. It looks like you provided
>     a Payload length of 0 in your OFDM modulator block.
>     If I set the payload length to 100 and then the random source Num.
>     samples to the same value, the BER goes to 0 without adding delay.
>     And you can see the BER moving when you change the delay.
>
>     There is one problem though, it doesn't seem to work when the
>     payload length and the Num. samples are not set to the same value.
>
>
>     Regards,
>     Jawad
>
>
>     2015-09-01 13:50 GMT+02:00 ANTONIO TAMAYO <atamayo2...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:atamayo2...@gmail.com>>:
>
>         Hello Jawad,
>
>         I have tried to use the delay block but I keep having the same
>         problem. I have attached an image of how I used the block. I
>         also attached an image of the value of BER obtained, whenever
>         I make changes to the delay block I get the value of 0.1251.
>         So the problem is not resolved. Also, I tried change the
>         paremeter simbol per bit in the Error Rate block, but the
>         problem persists. What is the optimal value for this
>         parameter? Regarding the use of the throttle block I tried to
>         run this diagram without him and the value BER is the same.
>         Thank you for answering my emails, your answers are very useful.
>         I've included our previous emails in the end of this email.
>         Thank you.
>
>         Regards,
>         Antonio
>
>
>         
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         > Hello,
>         >
>         > I'm doing my College final project about gnuradio companion.
>         Specifically
>         > I have to calculate the BER with OFDM using different
>         modulations to the
>         > subcarriers. After that, I have to do a graphic with the BER
>         numbers. The
>         > configuration I use is in the image attached.
>         > When I'm using GRC to calculate BER I always have the same
>         problem. First
>         > I try to simulate without introducing any noise and get a
>         BER data. Then I
>         > try to introduce AWGN noise and the BER data is the same.
>         Clearly I'm
>         > making a mistake, but I'm not able to identify what it is.
>         In view of the
>         > configuration used, someone could tell me which are my mistakes?
>         > Also, I would like to know how to configure the block
>         Channel Model
>         > correctly.
>         >
>         > Thank you all.
>         >
>
>         Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:41:10 +0200
>         From: Jawad Seddar <jawad.sed...@gmail.com
>         <mailto:jawad.sed...@gmail.com>>
>         To: gnuradio mailing list <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>         <mailto:discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>>
>         Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] How to calculate BER in different
>                 modulations with OFDM using GNURadio Companion
>         Message-ID:
>                
>         <cae9wgf80dwtktgo0tuq4p4nreihpnprxjdcvh7g5feusmds...@mail.gmail.com
>         
> <mailto:cae9wgf80dwtktgo0tuq4p4nreihpnprxjdcvh7g5feusmds...@mail.gmail.com>>
>         Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>         Hi Antonio,
>
>         The problem might be due to delay introduced by the processing
>         blocks.
>         Your OFDM modulator and demodulator don't work
>         instantaneously, they take
>         some time to do their processing and forward their outputs to
>         the next
>         block in line. Therefore, there is a delay between the output
>         of the OFDM
>         demod block and the original signal.
>         What you need to do is add a delay block between your Random
>         source and the
>         BER block and set the delay properly.
>         When you're not adding any noise, your BER should be 0. So you
>         can try to
>         find the delay value this way.
>         Then add noise and see how your BER evolves.
>
>         I hope this helps.
>
>         Regards,
>         Jawad
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to