You are right, cause I was looking in a process manager and only one core
was 100% busy, but since the middle filter had 37k taps it might be that
the other two were starving a little bit.
BTW, in the shown flograph, I would like to have signal in upper and down
paths synchronized, so I introduced delay of (N-1)/2, where N is the number
of taps in the middle filter. However signals in the files are not
synchronized. What could cause that?

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Marcus D. Leech <mle...@ripnet.com> wrote:

>  On 05/12/2015 12:52 PM, Nemanja Savic wrote:
>
>
> You are probably right, cause that file doesn't even exist. I looked at
> default gnuradio-core.conf in conf.d.
>  I suppose that something like that should be written in
> gnuradi-core.conf, but really nothing.
>  Where can I find which option should be added?
>
> How are you determining that this is only occupying a single core?
>
> Are you running on a VM?   If so, how many cores does your VM simulate?
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Marcus D. Leech <mle...@ripnet.com>
> wrote:
>
>>   On 05/12/2015 12:25 PM, Nemanja Savic wrote:
>>
>>   Hi all guys,
>>
>>  I have a flowgraph where I have three parallel paths for filtering
>> signal stored in a file. Here the picture of my flowgraph:
>>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>>  I use gnuradio 3.6.5.1. When I run the script it uses only one
>> processor, and since I have 4 cores, I would like to run every of the paths
>> on another processor. For every filter I do set_processr_affinity[some
>> number between 0 and ]. When I run the script nothing changes, it still
>> runs on a single core. Am I missing something with set_processor_affinity
>> method?
>>
>>  Best,
>>
>> --
>> Nemanja Savić
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>> listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>  My guess is that your ~/.gnuradio/config.conf   specifies to use the
>> single-threaded scheduler.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Nemanja Savić
>
>
>


-- 
Nemanja Savić
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to