The sequential rates I gave are the published rates for the SSD. Maybe (probably?) specsmanship, sure. But since it does mostly keep up, isn't this a case of just needing the correct buffer set-up to allow it to ride through the worst of the hiccups?
I am going to have to find and figure out how to run rx_samples_to_file before I can let you know if it makes any difference. - John On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:07 PM, <mle...@ripnet.com> wrote: > How did you test your sequential-write rate? > Writing files that are less than the current write-behind buffer size in the > kernel will give you a very false sense of how fast your disk subsystem is. > Again, if you use rx_samples_to_file, instead of GR at all, do you see any > significant change in the overrun issues? _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
