Hi, > Hi Ralph,
> I see... Hm. The point is that most of us is not really deep into the WX code > base, and GNU Radio is planning to move away from WX to QT, and since I > can't reproduce the problem locally, it's going to be very hard to get you > running. It really *is* an odd failure if only the scope is failing. So I will have a look at the qt stuff and simply forget about wx. To by honest, I never bothered what kind of GUI I am using, but when qt GUI offers the same functionality, so why stay with wx?! > Generally, if your application is "simple enough" to just switch Generate > Options from "WX" to "Qt" and replace a few GUI elements, then I'd > recommend using Qt; it's more modern, and it will stick around longer. Most > features can be configured even at runtime using "middle-click" on the > visualization. Yep, it is all quite simple stuff, nothing special. The scope I even do not really need most of the time, just the waterfall is nice to have. > Greetings, > Marcus Ralph. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
