Dear Martin,

I tried to call it in the constructor, and it's the same as call it in the
work function. It didn't work as I expected.
I was actually trying to update and adding more features to peak_detector2.
There is a conditional statement below in my work function.

if( noutput_items >= d_look_ahead)

I tried to use set_min_noutput_items (d_look_ahead) in the constructor and
in the work function. Neither of these two ways helped me satisfy the above
condition.


Best regards,
Zhe


On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com> wrote:

> I don't know the details off the top of my head, but this might be one of
> those functions that you can't call during work(). Have you tried calling
> it in the ctor?
>
> M
>
> On 01.04.2015 08:34, Zhe Feng wrote:
>
>> Dear Marcus,
>>
>> Thanks for your comment!
>> I made a typo my previous post that I was going to say
>> "set_min_noutput_items" but I wrote "set_noutput_items". I actually used
>> it in the work function, but it didn't seem to function as I expected.
>> After reading your comment, I put it in the constructor and nothing
>> changed.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Zhe
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com
>> <mailto:marcus.muel...@ettus.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>     noutput_items is what GNU Radio can maximally allow your block to
>>     produce, which is the free size in the output buffer, which is the
>> input
>>     buffer of the next block.
>>     So if your block is faster than the downstream block, you will see
>>     exactly the behaviour you are observing. This is normal, and good.
>>
>>     There's nothing the scheduler can do about this -- something
>>     "downstream" of your block just "backs up" the item flow, and your
>> block
>>     will have to wait until whatever is downstream of it is done consuming
>>     input, so that there is space for output from your block again.
>>
>>     You could try using set_min_noutput_items [1] in your block's
>>     constructor, so that GNU Radio won't even ask you to work() if there's
>>     not enough space available.
>>
>>     Greetings,
>>     Marcus
>>
>>
>>     [1]
>>     http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/classgr_1_1block.html#
>> a65cfc579150dc4d10c6180d3365aa9a8
>>
>>     On 04/01/2015 04:47 PM, Zhe Feng wrote:
>>      > Dear all,
>>      >
>>      > I'm experiencing a problem with the noutput_items.
>>      >
>>      > I have written a sync block which did "return" several times. I
>>     found the
>>      > noutput_items dropped exactly by the amount that I returned. For
>>     example, if
>>      > I wrote "return 10", after that, I printed noutput_items and found
>> it
>>      > decreased to noutput_items -10.
>>      >
>>      > Due to this fashion, the noutput_items could decrease to a value
>>     that one of
>>      > my "if statement" isn't satisfied. In that case, several items
>>     wouldn't be
>>      > outputed so the actual size of output items is smaller than the
>>     size of
>>      > input items. Is it still a sync block?
>>      >
>>      > I tried to wait for the noutput_items to increase but it didn't
>>     happen. I
>>      > tried to use "set_noutput_items( )" or "set_output_buffer()" to
>>     some values
>>      > I wanted, but they also failed.
>>      >
>>      > So I'm asking that how to tell the scheduler effectively that I
>>     want to
>>      > increase the noutput_items?
>>      >
>>      > Thanks!
>>      > Best regards,
>>      > Zhe
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > --
>>      > View this message in context:
>>     http://gnuradio.4.n7.nabble.com/How-to-increase-the-
>> noutput-items-tp53075.html
>>      > Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>      >
>>      > _______________________________________________
>>      > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>      > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>>      > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>     Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Zhe Feng
>> Electrical Engineering: System
>> University of Michigan Ann Arbor
>> Tel: 734-834-3188
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>



-- 
Zhe Feng
Electrical Engineering: System
University of Michigan Ann Arbor
Tel: 734-834-3188
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to