On 10/28/2014 12:58 AM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > This is to inform you that I'm giving up trying to transition the swig > bindings to generate builtin classes. I may revisit this decision if > I'll get encouraging answers from swig developers on the swig mailing > lists, but I believe this is very unlikely. > > While the changes to the interface definition files are nominally > extremely small, I'm hitting bugs in swig that make the exercise > extremely painful and I fear impossible without patching swig itself. > I also fear that no matter what I can do, the binding egenrated are > going to stay sub-optimal due to intrinsic limitations of swig. > > I prefer to spent my spare time doing something more rewarding that > fighting an under documented, inconsistent, and buggy system.
Thanks for trying. Can't blame you for being fed up with SWIG. M _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
