Yes. BPSK Mapper is custom block though it isn't written by me.Both encoders 
and decode objects parallelism level are defined as 1. Actually when I rebuild 
the flow graph, connect each block in turn, it runs in the first time but then 
comes back to that situation.
Hoang Ngo-KhacResearch Assistant - Lab. of Signal and System, FET, UET, Vietnam 
National University-Hanoi (VNU-H)Alternative email:  khachoang1...@gmail.com, 
hoangnk...@vnu.edu.vnMobilephone:  +84.163.682.7874

From: t...@trondeau.com
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 16:02:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FEC gnuradio 3.7.6 error
To: khachoang1...@outlook.com.vn
CC: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org



On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Hoang Ngo-Khac <khachoang1...@outlook.com.vn> 
wrote:



Dear all,
I am checking FEC Extended Encoder/Decoder in gnuradio-3.7.6 and would like to 
embed it in my OFDM transmission. 
First, I run the flowgraph below. It works and I can see how FEC improve the 
results.
              However, when I change some blocks, for example, using BPSK 
Mapper (as below), it throws me the error: 
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument'  what(): 
 destination already in use by edge deinterleave0:0->fec_encoder0:0
              
When I modify the flow graph, this error happen regularly even when the new 
inserted block is not connected dirrectly to Encoder or Decoder block.  To make 
FEC work with my OFDM transmission, I need to make the Encoder and Decoder work 
compatibly with my blocks. But as you can see, it stops working with when I 
insert BPSK Mapper to the flow graph, let alone more complicated blocks like 
OFDM Modulation. 
Please help me to figure out the problem and fix it. Any clue would be 
appreciated.
Best,Hoang Ngo 
I'm assuming that BPSK Mapper is your own block? I'm wondering if there's 
anything in there that would cause this problem. Connecting one block instead 
of another should not cause any different behavior in the preceding block.
For the encoder and decoder objects, are you defining them with any level of 
parallelism?
Tom 
                                          
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to