Hello Martin, I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that there is no way of doing what I want without copying over to my class the implementation of the block that is in the _impl class?
Why is this a good thing? Cheers, Daniele On 10/10/14 12:16, Martin Braun wrote: > You're right -- that's one of the reasons why we try and keep the > block's guts (their kernels) elsewhere than the actual block definition. > > Not all of our blocks do this, though. > > M > > On 10/10/2014 12:03 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: >> Hello, >> >> this question my arise from my ignorance about C++, but I don't >> understand how, if it is possible, to sub-class a GNURadio block that >> has moat of his code in an _impl class. >> >> To my understanding I would need to subclass both the class defining the >> block and his _impl class. However, it seems that the _impl class is not >> part of the exposed API, therefore there is no way to subclass it. There >> is way to achieve this without copying around significant portions of code? >> >> The case at hand is subclassing gr::analog::pll_carriertracking_cc >> changing the phase_detector() method to use the regular atan2() instead >> of the fast version. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Cheers, >> Daniele >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
