On 06/20/2014 02:42 AM, Marcus Müller wrote: > - It was expected that if SWIG wasdone right, GNU Radio could end up > with multiple scripting language interfaces [2]. Nowadays, people are > content to use python, especially since we now (feels like yesterday) > have support to write gr::block classes in python, which of course > needed a lot of gateway work, so (to my knowledge) there haven't been > efforts to make use of more than the C++ and Python SWIG capabilities[3].
There was work done at one point that actually made it into the tree to output Scheme wrappers for GNU Radio. This was good, in that it forced us to distinguish Python specific SWIG constructs vs. the generic SWIG code. Ultimately, the original author of the Scheme wrappers was not around to maintain it, and the feature was removed after some time. I've heard anecdotally that someone got C# wrappers working, but I've never seen it. I personally have some interest in wrapping GNU Radio for golang, and have been looking at what size effort that is, but it has been a pretty low priority. (agree with Tom's, Marcus', and Martin's replies on everything else.) -- Johnathan Corgan, Corgan Labs SDR Training and Development Services http://corganlabs.com
<<attachment: johnathan.vcf>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
