On 03/09/2014 07:51 PM, Jens Elsner wrote: >> I take this to mean I should have both students submit proposals, and >> that there's a possibility both of them will be selected to work on >> the project. Does that sound right? I'm guessing my project idea is so >> obscure there's very little chance of Google wanting to dedicate *two* >> students to it. But it seems like that's the only way both students >> will be able to receive a stipend. Bummer... > > Google only tells us how many slots for students we get, they don't care > about > how we allocate them to projects. I was a mentor for two LDPC-related > projects > last year. The projects covered the same area and we decided to split > the work > along the lines of different encoding/decoding algorithms. I think your > proposal could be handled in a similar way.
Exactly -- provided that: * You are willing to mentor two students * They both individually apply *and* are among the best applicants * You can find different milestones for each student, that are each verifiable by any outsider In theory, the proposals can overlap a lot, since, in theory, both students might not know of each other's. However, in this case, I recommend some prior splitting up of tasks. Martin _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
