One more question: Can I change the relative rate (with set_relative_rate) while the flowgraph is running? What effect does that have?
Miklos On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Miklos Maroti <mmar...@math.u-szeged.hu> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Ok, I think I have fixed the problem. I did not set the relative rate > properly in the constructor. It seems, that the scheduler uses the > relative rates to allocate buffers before the graph is executed, and > if some block is requesting more data at runtime, then we get into > problems. It is good to know. > > I wonder if I can set the relative rate differently for different > input streams... but I could not find anything. > > Best, > Miklos > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@ettus.com> wrote: >> On 01/24/2014 07:28 AM, Miklos Maroti wrote: >>>> I did not set anything explicitly, although I did not set in my xxx >>>> block the set relative rate (maybe that is used by the scheduler to >>>> set up the buffer sizes appropriately). >>> >>>> Basically I want to take 100 packets of size 160 and push them through >>>> an S/P converter for an 128 point IFFT (think of OFDM where every >>>> subcarrier would carry its own packets independently). >>> >>>> Miklos >> >> We still need to know the precise blocks and flow graph configuration. >> >> MB >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
