Hi Ting - Sorry, there really wasn't a good reason for me to not answer your question, regardless =)
So the ADCs are indeed 14 bits, but those samples go through a lot of processing on a number of different platforms, and get sent over a few different buses. At any of these stages, depending on your system parameters, there might be conversions and scaling factors applied to the data, which changes the representation. Remember that since the ADC is a 14-bit ADC, you are never really getting more precision than those 14-bits; they are just different ways of representing that data. Does that help, at all? Cheers, Ben On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ben Hilburn <b...@ettus.com> wrote: > Ting - > > This question really isn't GNURadio related. If you resend it over the > USRP-Users list, though, we will help explain things quickly! > > http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com > > Cheers, > Ben > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Ting Wu < > wu.t...@comf5.comm.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Both of USRP N210 and N200 have 14 bit ADC, which means a range of >> +/-2e13=+/-8129. >> >> However, as I tested a N210 with LFRX, I got values from -32704 ~ 30073, >> close to +/-2e15=32768. >> >> Last year, I also tested a N200 with LFRX, I got values from -16357 ~ >> 16241, close to +/-2e14=16384. >> >> The sampling rate was set to 4 MHz. >> >> >> >> So why does the ADC has a real resolution higher than 14 bit, and are >> N210 and N200 the same? >> >> I’m really new to the world of ADC, so some basics would be very helpful. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> Wu >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
