Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] zero ninput_items_required[0]

[Marcus Müller]

Hi Nemanja, Considering following flowgraph, assume your block is A, and assume all blocks work with the same itemsize. good question, but basically, when running, when A is done with a run of work, it's thread notifies blocks "upstream" (B in this case) that it has consumed input items, making that space available for new output; GNU radio then calls forecast of B with a noutput_items to fill that space. However, if the upstream block B needs more input items than C has provided, GNU Radio will repeatedly reduce the number of samples it asks for until B needs less or equal samples as C has produced. In your case, this only happens for 0 output items; thus your general_work gets called with 0 input items, as Martin already stated. So what happens then? Since A has not provided any more output items for the blocks downstream, D can't do anything that it has not already been doing. The downstream part of the flowgraph stalls. Upstream part: Since GNU Radio has not been able to supply you with more than 0 input items, we can assume that the upstream part of the flowgraph is stuck, or done. Therefore, execution ends here. Greetings, Marcus On 10/18/2013 03:19 PM, Nemanja Savic wrote: Thank you Martin, I will try with the sync_decimator, but it is also important for me to unterstand what's happening here. So, I have vector source -> throttle -> fsk_modulator -> scope sink. Vector source generates 8 symbols. From where scheduler starts, from source or from the sink? And why it didn't stop for any value before 0? What should I add into general block to avoid this? Thank you On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Martin Braun (CEL) <martin.br...@kit.edu> wrote: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:32:48PM +0200, Nemanja Savic wrote: > The body of my forecast function is: > > ninput_items_required[0] = noutput_items * d_sym_rate / d_sampling_freq; > printf("ninput_items_required %d, noutput_items %d\n", ninput_items_required > [0], noutput_items); If d_sym_rate and d_sampling_freq are integers, integer division will cause ninput_items_required to be zero for small values of noutput_items. > when i run execution, the output is following: > > ninput_items_required 8, noutput_items 4096 > ninput_items_required 4, noutput_items 2048 > ninput_items_required 2, noutput_items 1024 > ninput_items_required 1, noutput_items 512 > ninput_items_required 0, noutput_items 256 > ninput: 0, produced: 0 > > The last line of the output comes from general_work function and prints number > of input items and number of produced output samples. > > Can somebody explain me why forecast is called 5 times, till number of input > items reach 0, and after that nothing is possible in work function, cause it > won't enter the loop since ninput_items = 0; Depending on the state of the buffers, the scheduler calls forecast() until it finds a value of ninput_items_required that works (it tries to process as much as possible). In your case, there is probably some situation where the input buffer is not full. The way you've set up forecast(), the scheduler will eventually find out that it doesn't need any items to produce at least 256 output items. So it calls work() with no input data, expecting 256 output items. But since you can't produce anything without input, nothing happens. It seems like what you want is a sync_decimator, got a gr::block. This means you set relative_rate in the ctor and don't need to handle all of this yourself. Make sure you don't set relative_rate to zero, again! In a sync_decimator, you won't need forecast() at all and your work function is much simpler. The scheduler will also never try to call a sycn_decimator w/o input. MB -- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Communications Engineering Lab (CEL) Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun Research Associate Kaiserstraße 12 Building 05.01 76131 Karlsruhe Phone: +49 721 608-43790 Fax: +49 721 608-46071 www.cel.kit.edu KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio -- Nemanja Savić _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio