Hello,

I git cloned the atscfixup branch and tried building it. Here's as far as I
got:

In file included from
/users/mranga/gr-atscfixup/gnuradio/gr-atsc/lib/receiver/atsc_fpll.cc:27:
/users/mranga/gr-atscfixup/gnuradio/gr-atsc/include/gnuradio/atsc/fpll.h:32:44:
error: gnuradio/atsc/diag_output_impl.h: No such file or directory

Perhaps this file was accidentally left out of the repository (?)

Ranga





On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Johnathan Corgan <johnat...@corganlabs.com
> wrote:

> On 07/15/2013 07:01 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
>
> > After this stuff and the reorganization a simple diff would not have
> > saved much, also i'm working on 'atsc_tx.py',so 'all_atsc.py' would
> > be confusing, hence the name change.
>
> First, let me say that I'm very happy this code is getting some
> attention. It was originally written to use the low-IF output of a TV
> tuner and ADC, and also when GNU Radio only had a single-threaded
> scheduler.  Later, it was only minimally modified to use the USRP
> complex baseband IQ output. (I wasn't around GNU Radio at the time and
> the above is only what I surmise by looking at the code history.)
>
> The changes you describe are more like it would have been written had
> the USRP existed at the time.
>
> The all_atsc.py file was a work-in-progress effort by Ben Reynwar that I
> merged in, but he and I never finished what we were going to do with it.
>
> > Also the other scripts seem unnecessary with the new
> > thread-per-block sceduler, the also seem to cause a lot of beginners
> > confusion. So I felt they needed to go.
>
> Agree.
>
> > I have also built a ( semi ) working complex fpll for gr-atsc, this
> > removes the need for up-converting and the filtering after the
> > current fpll, my next atsc_rx will need the new script style. After I
> > finish updating the bit timing loop we will be almost real time I
> > believe!
>
> The upconversion and filtering is a large CPU waste when it could be
> done at baseband, but it seems this was just a quick-and-dirty way to
> get the baseband IQ from a USRP to look like a low-IF output instead in
> order to re-use what was already written and working.
>
> Real-time execution would be a welcome accomplishment!
>
> > P.S. I could still just do the diff to the old all_atsc.py and rename
> > if you want.
>
> No need.
>
> By the way, before any of this can be merged, we'll need a copyright
> assignment from you.  I'll email you off-list about how this works.
>
> Thanks again for working on this.
>
> --
> Johnathan Corgan
> Corgan Labs - SDR Training and Development Services
> http://corganlabs.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>


-- 
M. Ranganathan
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to