Ø The associated mutex is usually a (private) member variable of a class, and is used as a synchronization object by different class methods. As a member variable, you have a choice to name it whatever you want. If the mutex is the only one in the class, we usually call it d_mutex. If there is more than one mutex in the class, then we give it a unique name.
Ø If you're writing your own code as a class, making the mutex a member variable and calling it d_mutex, and calling the local scoped lock object 'guard', is probably the most descriptive, but again, it's up to you. OK, that helps, thanks. One additional question - looking file_meta_source_impl.cc, it uses 'd_mutex' in all cases; in most places in the file, the object is called 'guard(d_mutex)'. But in one place the object is called 'lock(d_mutex)'... Is that a mistake? I got concerned when I read some about this on the net, saying that it is easy to forget that a local object will get destroyed when the scope that created it closes. Hence the need for d_mutex to get defined as a private class member (but it compiles fine if that step is forgotten). Tim
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
