Yes, bringing this back up. Back to the original topic.  When I get this
FIFO ctrl error, the host is sending back an icmp port unreachable msg to
the usrp, I grab this using wireshark.

All I'm doing is running "uhd_usrp_probe".  I've tried with and without
adding the --args addr=<ip> parameter, same thing using both.

I've debugged a bit, and increased the ACK_TIMEOUT in
usrp/usrp2/usrp2_fifo_ctrl.cpp from 0.5 to 10.0 and it literally just sits
at:

Creating the usrp device with: ...
-- Opening a USRP2/N-Series device...
-- Current recv frame size: 1472 bytes
-- Current send frame size: 1472 bytes
<sits here for 10 seconds>

Then spits out
RuntimeError: RuntimeError: fifo ctrl timed out looking for acks

Again, there is a switch in between the USRP and the host.

Tim


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Sean Nowlan
<sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>wrote:

> I think 512 is the max value for N on N200/N210 hence 195kSps is minimum
> sample rate.
>
>
> Karan Talasila <karan....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> @sean can you please tell me how you got minimum sampling rate for usrp
> N210 as 100*e6/512. I know that the sampling rate should be 100*e6/N where
> N is an integer. So N can be any integer even greater than 512 right. In
> that way, what is the minimum that the USRP accepts. what is maximum N that
> can be used.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Sean Nowlan 
> <sean.now...@gtri.gatech.edu>wrote:
>
>> On 06/12/2013 08:49 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/12/2013 08:29 PM, Sean Nowlan wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The minimum "reasonable" sample rate I've used is 2e5 (100e6/2e5 =
>>>> 500). I think 100e6/512 = 195312.5 is the smallest supported rate.
>>>>
>>>>  Yup, sorry, you're right.  I tend to pick values that are valid for
>>> both 64Msps and 100Msps master clock rates, since I write apps that need to
>>> be reasonably
>>>   agnostic with respect to hardware.
>>>
>>>
>>>  Ah, makes sense.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/**listinfo/discuss-gnuradio<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Karan Talasila
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to