On 29 Aug 2012 15:13, Josh Blum wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 03:24 PM, Anisha Gorur wrote: > >> Sorry for the confusion. We are trying to synchronize 3 usrps for collect. The devices seem to be time aligned in that the samples are timestamped with the same metadata, so we believed that synchronization had been achieved. However, when the data collected from the usrps was correlated, samples that should have had 0 time difference of arrival were off by as many as 5 samples, at a sample rate of 6.25MS/S. So even though the timestamps are time aligned, the data does not seem to be. The devices have been synchronized PPS times, not uspr.get_time_now(). Thank you, Anisha > > Can you tell me more about the correlation? Are you sending a impulse > split to all 3 devices and determining the pulse arrival. Is the error > in time of arrival consistent between runs or does it seem to be random? > > If you ask all N USRPs to stream at time X, the time reported in the > metadata will still be X, even if the internal tick count in each device > is not marching in lock step. > > I have a few suggestions: > > 1) I think you have 1 GPSDO per USRP providing each a different > reference. I would first try the experiment with a shared 10 MHz > reference and PPS to all devices to confirm the algorithm. You will need > to move the 10 MHz reference jumper back so you can provide an external > ref via SMA. I've observed, in a previous life, phase-hits between two GPSDOs connected to the same antenna, watching the same cluster of satellites. Never figured out why, which is why for phase-sensitive work, it makes sense to use a common reference, (like an external GPSDO), rather than a GPSDO-per-unit.
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
