On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Josh Blum <j...@joshknows.com> wrote: > >> So, I don't actually care what the square wave source emits if there's a >> reason for it, but was there a reason it was implemented as a delayed >> square wave rather than the analytic representation? Is there actually a >> use for complex square/saw/triangle wave sources? Am I just causing trouble >> and it's way too late to be changing the behavior of this block? >> > > Some total nOOb added the triangle, square, sawtooth waveforms to signal > source. There was a spot to fill in the complex versions of these > waveforms, so it just kind of got filled in... doesnt mean much. > > My only regret was not making ramp function cross 0. > > -josh
Yeah, seems like it was the easiest solution to build. I'm sure we can update it to be a real analytic signal (although, using a Hilbert filter for the transform doesn't perform a _real_ Hilbert transform since it's limited by the filter representation of it). If there's a useful patch for this, send it along! Tom _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
