Tom Rondeau wrote on 2012-06-04 14:18: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Patrick Strasser > <patrick.stras...@student.tugraz.at> wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> Tom Rondeau wrote on 2012-06-03 17:12: >>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Patrick Strasser >>> Patrick, >>> >>> It looks like you're problem is in the rational_resampler code. I >>> wonder if there's something about the resampling rate being used >>> that's causing something to go out of bounds here. Can you dig into >>> the code and figure out what interpolation and decimation rates are >>> being used? >> >> Interpolation is 1, decimation is 2.
>> Full valgrind log in >> http://pastebin.com/7GCs3bWy > > I was hoping you'd say the interpolation and/or decimation were some > ridiculously large numbers. Since the block is only actually > decimating, could you replace it in the code with an fir_filter_fff > (or fft_filter_fff) just for testing purposes? That'll help us see if > it's the rational resampler itself or something more general. What seems strange to me is the allocation of a buffer of a non by 8 dividable size, that is accessed in blocks of 8 bytes. So the last read always either does not touch the end of the buffer, or it reads beyond the end. I'm a little sparse at time until Sunday evening. I tried to write some mini program starting from dial_tone.cc which uses a filter, have to convince cmake to compile it... learning ;-) Regards Patrick -- Engineers motto: cheap, good, fast: choose any two Patrick Strasser <patrick dot strasser at tugraz dot at> Student of Telematics, Graz Univ. of Technology, Austria _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
