On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 18:43, Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> wrote: > On 04/02/2012 09:27 AM, Stefan Ott wrote: >> Hey >> >> Just curious, have you had a chance to look at this? >> >> Also, in the meantime I tried using your kernel tree >> (e100-3.0-pm-2-fixes-from-review) which seems to have a newer version >> of the usrp_e driver, built with the kernel configuration that I took >> from a working USRP image. However, when trying to modprobe the usrp-e >> module, I get: > > That branch is not done yet :)
Ah, good to know :) > I just updated github to match the current shipping kernel (from last > week) See the e100-3.0-pm-2-bugfixes branch. In particular, I added some > code to do some range checking on the values passed to the ioctl in: > > https://github.com/balister/linux-omap-philip/commit/057c170c1bae5f036c9b37838405b9d1d773ab84 Ah thanks. I just built a new kernel using that patch (i.e. from the e100-3.0-pm-2-bugfixes branch). I hope that was the right one, the usrp_e driver looks ok but is only at version 0.2 as opposed to the one from the e100-3.0-pm-2-fixes-from-review branch which is at version 0.3. I still get a segfault / kernel NULL pointer dereference as soon as I modprobe usrp_e though. cheers -- Stefan Ott Communication and Distributed Systems Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics University of Bern _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio