Doesn't sound as good to me, maybe it's just a bad sample. I for some reason ( I know the math tells me otherwise ) I find it sounds better the faster I sample, like 500M. I feel like it has something to do with more exact following of the FM signal curve or something.
So how exactly does the software FM Demod work ( crossing detection )? And why can my $5 toy FM radio sound so much cleaner? On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Marcus D. Leech <mle...@ripnet.com> wrote: > On 03/12/2012 09:01 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: >> >> On 03/12/2012 09:09 AM, Rafael Diniz wrote: >>> >>> Marcus, >>> Have you done any improvements to the good old RDS code in cgran? >>> >>> >> Just updated the simple_fm_rcv code to use 250e3 sample rate, since >> that's a common rate between B100/USRP1/E1XX and N2XX family, and >> all the math "works out". That will more lightly load the cpu as well, >> compared to 320e3. >> >> >> >> > And here's an audio sample using the new "common" sample rate: > > http://www.sbrac.org/files/fm_stereo_test2.ogg > > > > -- > Marcus Leech > Principal Investigator > Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium > http://www.sbrac.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
