On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Martin Braun <martin.br...@kit.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:49:56AM +0100, Martin Braun wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 02:31:03PM -0500, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > > > I think that what I'd do is cause the close() method to simply set a > flag that > > > says "close desired", and then do the actual close at the end of > > > the work function, probably under a mutex. > > > > That sounds sensible. It could be done in do_update(). > > I'm sending a patch to patch-gnuradio. In it's current form, it's just > not thread-safe. > But wont this only close() a file when the sink is receiving samples? I would think it would be extremely confusing if close() doesnt actually close a file until the next sample is received, especially if there is a valve in front of the wav_file sink.
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
