On 11/16/2011 03:50 PM, Josh Blum wrote: > > > On 11/16/2011 02:57 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: >> Ben, Josh, >> Where are we with this? We had good momentum and were like 95% there, but >> then we dropped it about a month ago. I believe that Josh had a branch >> that, using cmake, took the docstrings code and would build a .i file per >> top-level component and install it with the Python code. I think the issue >> was that this only got the constructors, but Ben's note here talks about >> fixing that. Has this been ported to the cmake build process to >> autogenerate the doc strings? >>
You're such slave driver Tom http://gnuradio.org/cgit/jblum.git/log/?h=more_swigness_docs I only did core and digital. GRC seems to extract the docs just fine. The digital should stand as an example how to swig doc'ify the others > > Sorry, Ive just been too busy doing too many awesome things. I have a > branch with ben's latest python scripts for doc extractions, but its > gotten too stale, so heres my list to get this going again: > > 1) Get ben's python foo rebased off of latest master branch > 2) Get my cmake swig docs macro also rebased > 3) Implement in a few complicated places like gr-core, hopefully i can > get some help for the other components :-) > 4) Extract docstrings in grc's doc extractor/parser > > Sounds like a good weekend project. > > -Josh _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
