On 11/02/2011 04:43 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: > On 11/02/2011 07:39 PM, Josh Blum wrote: >> >> On 11/02/2011 04:35 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote: >>> It looks like setting the delay after block instantiation doesn't do >>> anything. I checked to see whether it was a GRC issue, or the block >>> itself, >>> and indeed, gr_delay doesn't do anything with a post-instantiation >>> setting. >> trackered new issue -> http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/462 >> >> thanks >> -josh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> >> > To be clear, the problem appears to be with the block itself. GRC > correctly adds the "set_delay" callback spooge. > > But calling that callback in the C++ code doesn't appear to affect the > delay. > >
I guess the delay block should add extra delay cycles or insert dummy samples depending upon the value. That could be useful -josh > _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
