On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:12:27PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:09:36PM -0700, Johnathan Corgan wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Eric Blossom <e...@comsec.com> wrote: > > > > > There's a bug in the on-the-wire format for the USRP2 where we're not > > > currently transmitting the valid length of the packet. With ethernet, > > > the minimum packet size is 64-bytes, and there are some times where > > > the host code is naively fragmenting the received samples in a way > > > that produces a packet that is too short for ethernet. > > > > > > I've opened ticket:378 on this. It will be properly fixed when we > > > rework the on-the-wire format as part of the VRT work, but I think > > > there's an intermediate step that can avoid most cases of the problem > > > happening. > > > > I had planned to at least temporarily work around this for gr-usrp by > > avoiding passing flowgraph data to libusrp2 that would result in these > > short fragments. This wouldn't fix things for low-level libusrp2 > > users, but it's a small change that would get us by until the real fix > > with the new VRT transport work. Let me know if this is an issue. > > Johnathan, > > After a bit of lunch, I think I can fix this in libusrp2 in a few minutes. > > I'll set up a developer branch in a bit and you all know when it's > ready to test. > > Eric
Ronaldo, Can you please check out, build and install this developer branch and let me know if your problem goes away? $ svn co http://gnuradio.org/svn/gnuradio/branches/developers/eb/t378 Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
