On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:44:21AM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:58:17PM -0400, Erich Stuntebeck wrote:
> > The daughterboard gain was set to the mid-point.
> >
> > I don't have the range of the time domain samples as I did the FFT
> > processing in real-time and discarded the raw data. The data was
> > collected using a script I wrote to link the USRP block with a custom
> > processing block that I wrote. This custom block take the FFT of the
> > incoming data and outputs the amplitude of the appropriate bin. It
> > determines the appropriate bin based on a given frequency as an input,
> > and searches a few neighboring bins in case of clock errors to select
> > the bin nearby with the maximum amplitude.
> >
> > I'm using the firmware without the half-band filter.
> >
> > The signal generator is an Agilent 33220A. I don't have a spectrum
> > analyzer, but I do have two of the 33220A's and they both perform the
> > same way so I'm guessing its not a calibration issue with the signal
> > generator.
>
A person who desires to remain anonymous passes on this comment:
eric, i saw your response on the mailing list (below). i think the
problem has nothing to do with gain.
in my opinion the mistake is that erich is using FFT without applying
a window-function first. in other words, he's using a 'rectangle'
window. a rectangle window is a bad choice for amplitude flatness
measurements, because the amplitude response depends on whether the
signal is at bin center, or between 2 bins (the worst case). there is
a difference of ~3.7dB between these two scenarios.
if he wants to measure flatness, he should use a window function which
is designed to give the same amplitude response for any frequency, be
it bin-centered of not. a 'flattop' window (google for it) is
recommended in that case - it has 0.02dB flatness.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
