The newer way will have better phase noise.
Matt
Newell Jensen wrote:
When doing this modification, is there any performance differences
between using a setup with this modification versus a newer USRP1 that
doesn't need this modification? I think I had heard that the newer
USRP1 has better clock performance or something for the RFX900 boards
and didn't know how much a setup with this modification would perform
in comparison to a setup with a newer USRP1 (using the RFX900 boards).
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Matt Ettus <m...@ettus.com
<mailto:m...@ettus.com>> wrote:
Gohar wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to use rfx900 with usrp rev 3 hardware that was
released in 2005? If yes, what changigs should be made on
either board (usrp board or rfx900 board) ?
On the RFX board
Move R36 to R34
Move R115 to R116
Put the rfx board on the USRP and run
burn-db-eeprom -t rfx900_mimo_a -f -A -B
Matt
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
--
Newell
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
