> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Padalino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 3:09 PM
> What do you think of those ideas? Do you have a proposed solution? > > Brian Of the two, I would prefer the rollover flag solution. If we are willing to put limit on how far ahead we can schedule then we should be able to decide implicitly if a wrap has occurred. 2^31, or half the counter range would provide a 32s range, and should be (way) more than enough. The host can delay longer before sending the packet if longer delays are required. The basic logic would be to check the delta, and if greater than 2^31, then make go/wait/drop decisions assuming a wrap is involved. --ets _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
