On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jeff Brower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg- > On days that I'm in philosophical mode, I completely agree. But the reality > is that MATLAB is far more widely used > than Octave. MATLAB is at the core of the commercial and academic RF > community, Octave is not. If we are to increase > awareness and popularity of GNU Radio, there is no escaping MATLAB > compatibility.
For this purpose you shouldn't think of Octave as something totally separate from MATLAB, think of it has the free software compatible version of MATLAB. If I were going to advocate something other than for purposes of compatibility it wouldn't be any matlab-esq language. Really with being built on python GNU radio already has much of what people need for development work all built in... _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
